Quote:
Originally Posted by tommm No doubt they want to prove Vale wrong, but to declare it as the only reason for them to improve is short sighted to say the least. Rossi was a huge selling point for them, but even if he hadn't left they would still have improved, even if it was just to stop Vale blaming them every week. In my opinion there is absolutley no way Michelin would have stood still and risked taking the bad press from Dani and Vale for another season, regardless of the loss. |
I dont' think anyone said it was the only reason... but the revenge factor has featured massively this year. Colin said it pretty wryly in an interview this year... can't remember which race... but that Michelin were pretty keen to "get him". His defection alone really flung a stinking pile of dog poo at them... it's one thing to say things to the media, week in, week out... another to take the total leap into the unknown that Rossi has taken by going to bridgestone. That he preferred the devil he didn't know to the one he did... Michelin lost any time to fart around by Rossi's defection... that they've shown an inclination to fart around... and Rossi bashing last year still didn't make them pull their finger out... his defection did, however.
Hey, and get this!
I agree totally with Jrcambs and Brno1996.

It is a "big picture" issue... there are a lot of chapters to the story... but fundamentally, Rossi's defection has been the major player in the speed with which Michelin have decided to step up their development. Doubling their development money? That should have happened at the end of 2006. And they knew the tyre rule was coming in, that they'd be at a disadvantage now that they'd be unable to make custom tyres... but did they care? NOOOOOO.